and post your comments….<\/a><\/p>\nThe U.S. establishment loathes Putin because, they say, he is an aggressor, a tyrant, a “killer.” He invaded and occupies Ukraine. His old KGB comrades assassinate journalists, defectors and dissidents.<\/p>\n
Yet while politics under both czars and commissars has often been a blood sport in Russia, what has Putin done to his domestic enemies to rival what our Arab ally Gen. Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi has done to the Muslim Brotherhood he overthrew in a military coup in Egypt?<\/p>\n
What has Putin done to rival what our NATO ally President Erdogan has done in Turkey, jailing 40,000 people since last July’s coup \u00e2\u20ac\u201d or our Philippine ally Rodrigo Duterte, who has presided over the extrajudicial killing of thousands of drug dealers?<\/p>\n
Does anyone think President Xi Jinping would have handled mass demonstrations against his regime in Tiananmen Square more gingerly than did President Putin this last week in Moscow?<\/p>\n
Much of the hostility toward Putin stems from the fact that he not only defies the West, when standing up for Russia’s interests, he often succeeds in his defiance and goes unpunished and unrepentant.<\/p>\n
He not only remains popular in his own country, but has admirers in nations whose political establishments are implacably hostile to him.<\/p>\n
In December, one poll found 37 percent of all Republicans had a favorable view of the Russian leader, but only 17 percent were positive on President Barack Obama.<\/p>\n
There is another reason Putin is viewed favorably. Millions of ethnonationalists who wish to see their nations secede from the EU see him as an ally. While Putin has openly welcomed many of these movements, America’s elite do not take even a neutral stance.<\/p>\n
Putin has read the new century better than his rivals. While the 20th century saw the world divided between a Communist East and a free and democratic West, new and different struggles define the 21st.<\/p>\n
The new dividing lines are between social conservatism and self-indulgent secularism, between tribalism and transnationalism, between the nation-state and the New World Order.<\/p>\n
On the new dividing lines, Putin is on the side of the insurgents. Those who envision de Gaulle’s Europe of Nations replacing the vision of One Europe, toward which the EU is heading, see Putin as an ally.<\/p>\n
So the old question arises: Who owns the future?<\/p>\n
In the new struggles of the new century, it is not impossible that Russia \u00e2\u20ac\u201d as was America in the Cold War \u00e2\u20ac\u201d may be on the winning side. Secessionist parties across Europe already look to Moscow rather than across the Atlantic.<\/p>\n
“Putin has become a symbol of national sovereignty in its battle with globalism,” writes Caldwell. “That turns out to be the big battle of our times. As our last election shows, that’s true even here.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"