That hysterical reaction to the travel ban announced Friday is a portent of what is to come if President Donald Trump carries out the mandate given to him by those who elected him.<\/p>\n
The travel ban bars refugees for 120 days. From Syria, refugees are banned indefinitely. And a 90-day ban has been imposed on travel here from Iraq, Syria, Iran, Libya, Sudan, Somalia and Yemen.<\/p>\n
Was that weekend-long primal scream really justified?<\/p>\n
As of Monday, no one was being detained at a U.S. airport.<\/p>\n
Yet the shrieking had not stopped. All five stories on page one of Monday’s Washington Post were about the abomination. The New York Times’ editorial, “Trashing American Ideals and Security,” called it bigoted, cowardly, xenophobic, Islamophobic, un-American, unrighteous.<\/p>\n
This ban, went the weekend wail, is the “Muslim ban” of the Trump campaign. But how so, when not one of the six largest Muslim countries \u00e2\u20ac\u201d Indonesia, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Egypt, Turkey \u00e2\u20ac\u201d was on the list? Missing also were three-dozen other Muslim countries.<\/p>\n
Of the seven countries facing a 90-day ban, three are U.S.-designated state sponsors of terror, and the other four are war zones. Clearly, this is about homeland security, not religious discrimination.<\/p>\n
The criterion for being included in the travel ban appears to be that these places are the more likely breeding grounds for terrorists.<\/p>\n
Yet there are lessons for the Trump White House in the media-stoked panic and outrage at the end of his first week in office.<\/p>\n
First, Steve Bannon’s observation that the media are “the opposition party,” is obviously on target. While Sen. Chuck Schumer was crying on camera that the ban was “un-American,” the media were into the more serious business of stampeding and driving the protesters.<\/p>\n
A second lesson is one every White House learns. Before a major decision is announced, if possible, get everyone’s input and everyone on board to provide what Pat Moynihan called the “second and third echelons of advocacy.” Those left out tend to leak.<\/p>\n
A third lesson Trump should learn is that the establishment he routed and the city he humiliated are out to break him as they broke LBJ on Vietnam, Nixon on Watergate, and almost broke Reagan on the Iran-Contra affair.<\/p>\n
While the establishment may no longer be capable of inspiring and leading the nation, so detested is it, it has not lost its appetite or its ability to break and bring down presidents.<\/p>\n