Register-Login

Support Buchanan.Org…

We depend on you to keep us online. Please send in a donation today!

Click here to use the U.S. mail or...

Select Any Amount:

Visitors Online

Archives

Calendar

November 2009
S M T W T F S
« Oct    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

Our Webserver

Get a Great American
WebHost - We did!

CrisisHost

CrisisHost is a proud supporter of free speech and the Ron Paul Revolution!

Our Site on Twitter

Twitter

Get Pat’s Latest Block Buster!

Churchill, Hitler and the Unnecessary War Order from Amazon...

Day of Reckoning

Day of Reckoning

State of Emergency

State of Emergency
January 10th, 2008

Ron Paul Votes Not Counted In New Hampshire District

Paul Joseph Watson – Prison Planet

Vote fraud confirmed, Clinton reversed mammoth pre-polling deficit to beat Obama, Diebold machines aid Giuliani, Romney

Major allegations of vote fraud in New Hampshire are circulating after Hillary Clinton reversed a mammoth pre-polling deficit to defeat Barack Obama with the aid of Diebold electronic voting machines, while confirmed votes for Ron Paul in the Sutton district were not even counted.

According to a voter in Sutton, New Hampshire , three of her family members voted for Ron Paul, yet when she checked the voting map on the Politico website, the total votes for Ron Paul were zero.

With 100% of precincts now reporting, the map still says zero votes for Ron Paul as you can see here.

It’s not as if Sutton had a handful of voters like some other districts – a total of 386 people voted yet we are led to believe that not one voted for Ron Paul? Judging by the Iowa results, around 10% of residents would be expected to vote for the Congressman, returning a total of around 38 votes in this district. Let’s be ultra-conservative and say just 5% support Paul – he’d still get 19 votes – but he got absolutely none whatsoever. Is there something wrong with this picture?

Greenville also tallied 144 votes yet not one for Congressman Paul.

Anyone else in Sutton who voted for Ron Paul needs to go public immediately with the charge of vote fraud and make it known that they were cheated out of their right to vote.

Diebold voting machines also did Congressman Paul no favors last night – compared to hand counted ballots Giuliani gained just short of 0.5% from electronic voting whereas Paul lost over 2%, which was the difference between finishing 4th and 5th, as this graph documents .

Mitt Romney profited the most from the Diebold swing, he received 7% more votes compared to hand counted ballots.

In the Democratic race the Diebold voting machines clearly swung the primary in Hillary Clinton’s favor at the expense of Barack Obama, who had a commanding lead over the New York Senator going into the contest.

Zogby polling numbers had Obama leading Clinton by a whopping 42/29 per cent, yet Clinton eventually took the primary by three per cent.

“If I was Barack Obama, I’d certainly not have conceded this election this quickly,” writes The Brad Blog . “I’m not quite sure what he was thinking. And as far as offering an indication of whether he understands how these systems work, and the necessity of making sure that votes are counted, and counted accurately, it does not offer a great deal of confidence at this hour.”

“While I have no evidence at this time — let me repeat, no evidence at this time — of chicanery, what we do know is that chicanery, with this particular voting system, is not particularly difficult. Particularly when one private company — and a less-than-respectable one at that, as I detailed in the previous post — runs the entire process.”

Clinton would not have beat Obama without the aid of Diebold voting machines. In precincts where electronic voting machines were used, Clinton got a 7% swing over Obama , having gained 5% in comparison to hand-counted ballots and Obama losing 2%.


As we reported yesterday
, the contract for programming all of New Hampshire’s Diebold voting machines, which combined counted 81 per cent of the vote yesterday, is owned by LHS Associates, whose owner John Silvestro has gone to great lengths to deflect accusations that the machines can easily be rigged.

After purchasing a Diebold 1.94w machine, the same system used in New Hampshire, a computer repair shop employee picked at random by Black Box Voting was able to zero in on the system’s vulnerable memory card within just ten minutes. Hacking expert Harri Hursti testified in front of the New Hampshire legislature that the machines were wide open to fraud.

Related posts:

  1. Protecting Ron Paul, the Rest of the “2nd Tier” and AmericaCitizen Vigilance Essential – We The People Foundation As things stand today, about 60 citizen...
  2. Case Challenges E-Voting’s Constitutionalityby Matthew Cardinale – IPS Interpress News Service ATLANTA, Georgia (IPS) – A case brought...
  3. Insanity of Voting for a “Winner”Don’t Vote for Fastest Race Horse By Matthew Hurtt – The Daily News Journal What...
  4. Don’t Silence Ron Paul!by Joseph Farah – WorldNetDaily.com As almost everyone who reads this column regularly know, I...
  5. Ron Paul Leads All ‘08 Candidates With Over One-fourth of Military Contributions for Q2I found this on TheSpinFactor.com Bottom line? Our U.S. Military is standing strong for Dr....
  6. Sobran: The Honor of Ron Paulby Joe Sobran I guess I’ve known Ron Paul for a quarter of a century...
  7. Ghettoizing Barackby Patrick J. Buchanan “I guess this is how the West was won,” Hillary Clinton...

Sorry, comments are closed on this post.